Home 5 Lab Industry Advisor 5 National Lab Reporter 5 CLIA-nir 5 Government Scrutiny of Theranos Increases

Government Scrutiny of Theranos Increases

by | Apr 18, 2016 | CLIA-nir, CMS-nir, Enforcement-nir, Essential, National Lab Reporter

Theranos continues to face challenges concerning its Newark, Calif., laboratory as its initial response to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) failed to resolve inspection issues and the agency recommended the company’s CLIA certification be revoked for that Calif. lab. CMS recommended that Theranos lose its CLIA certification unless the lab provides evidence why the recommended sanctions shouldn’t be imposed. That was based on an inspection that took place late last year where the agency determined Theranos’ Newark, Calif., laboratory had condition level deficiencies and posed an immediate danger to patients in the area of hematology. (See National Intelligence Report, 2/11/16, p. 3). Theranos provided corrective action in response but CMS concluded that the lab’s corrective actions were not credible, noting instances where Theranos plans were non-specific. Theranos can appeal the CLIA certificate revocation if it is imposed. CMS also recommended limitations on the lab’s performance of hematology assays that would take place almost immediately. Theranos faces a $10,000 daily fine for non-compliance. CMS has also requested a list of all providers who have used the lab since January to notify them of the ongoing issues at the facility. CMS’ 147-page inspection report charted a number of omissions and […]

Theranos continues to face challenges concerning its Newark, Calif., laboratory as its initial response to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) failed to resolve inspection issues and the agency recommended the company’s CLIA certification be revoked for that Calif. lab. CMS recommended that Theranos lose its CLIA certification unless the lab provides evidence why the recommended sanctions shouldn’t be imposed. That was based on an inspection that took place late last year where the agency determined Theranos’ Newark, Calif., laboratory had condition level deficiencies and posed an immediate danger to patients in the area of hematology. (See National Intelligence Report, 2/11/16, p. 3).

Theranos provided corrective action in response but CMS concluded that the lab’s corrective actions were not credible, noting instances where Theranos plans were non-specific. Theranos can appeal the CLIA certificate revocation if it is imposed. CMS also recommended limitations on the lab’s performance of hematology assays that would take place almost immediately. Theranos faces a $10,000 daily fine for non-compliance. CMS has also requested a list of all providers who have used the lab since January to notify them of the ongoing issues at the facility.

CMS’ 147-page inspection report charted a number of omissions and failures in the operation of the laboratory (Theranos’ facility in Arizona was not included in this report or the sanction recommendations). The issues enumerated relate to preanalytic systems and relevant documentation, chemistry quality control corrective actions, equipment calibration, laboratory director signoff on mandated procedures or changes to procedures, and failure to notify patient(s) of errors in test results in timely fashion.

There were some redactions to the report, including the annual test volume of the laboratory. Meanwhile, as our sister publication Laboratory Industry Report reported, a group of researchers from one of the most prestigious teaching hospitals in the nation questioned the validity of Theranos’ testing platform in a study published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation. Researchers from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai Hospital New York had 60 patients undergo common testing via Theranos’ retail sites in Arizona last year, and compared the results against more traditional venipuncture testing at LabCorp and Quest Diagnostics. The study included more than 18,000 data points and flagged tests outside its normal range of results 1.6 times more often than Quest and LabCorp. Of the 22 lab measurements evaluated, 15 (68 percent) showed significant interservice variability. And 2.2 percent of Theranos’ data results were missing, compared to 0.2 percent for LabCorp and no missing results for Quest. Theranos criticized the test results and the integrity of the study and its researchers, who it claimed didn’t disclose participation in a company Theranos labeled a competitor.

Finally, as we went to press, Bloomberg and The Wall Street Journal reported that in a memo to Theranos partners the company revealed it is the subject of investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Theranos Chief Executive Officer Elizabeth Holmes also appeared on NBC’s Today show in an interview with Maria Shriver and indicated she was “devastated” that her company didn’t catch problems earlier and she vowed to fix the problems and continue her company’s mission.

Takeaway: The number of federal agencies scrutinizing Theranos operations in California increases.

Subscribe to view Essential

Start a Free Trial for immediate access to this article