Home 5 Lab Industry Advisor 5 National Lab Reporter 5 Enforcement-nir 5 Democratic Committee Leaders and CMS Present Latest Challenges to Theranos

Democratic Committee Leaders and CMS Present Latest Challenges to Theranos

by | Jul 14, 2016 | Enforcement-nir, Essential, National Lab Reporter

Both the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and some high ranking Democratic Committee members had some bad news for Theranos at the start of this month. The company itself issued a statement announcing “CMS has decided to impose all available sanctions regarding our lab business.” Three members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee sent the company a letter expressing concern about the compliance issues and asking for a briefing on Theranos’ plans to address the issues. Briefing Request from E&C Committee Leaders Even before CMS announced that the company’s latest corrective actions were insufficient, three Democratic Committee leaders sent Theranos a letter seeking more information about “how company policies permitted systematic violations of federal law and how Theranos is working with regulators to address these failures,” as well as information about the “steps Theranos is taking to correct flawed test results sent to medical professionals and patients.” The letter came from Energy and Commerce Committee Ranking Member Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ), Health Subcommittee Ranking Member Gene Green (D-TX) and Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee Ranking Member Diana DeGette (D-CO). Dated June 30, the letter referred to the CMS Nov. 15 inspection of Theranos’ Newark, Calif., Laboratory and the […]

Both the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and some high ranking Democratic Committee members had some bad news for Theranos at the start of this month. The company itself issued a statement announcing “CMS has decided to impose all available sanctions regarding our lab business.” Three members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee sent the company a letter expressing concern about the compliance issues and asking for a briefing on Theranos’ plans to address the issues.

Briefing Request from E&C Committee Leaders
Even before CMS announced that the company’s latest corrective actions were insufficient, three Democratic Committee leaders sent Theranos a letter seeking more information about “how company policies permitted systematic violations of federal law and how Theranos is working with regulators to address these failures,” as well as information about the “steps Theranos is taking to correct flawed test results sent to medical professionals and patients.” The letter came from Energy and Commerce Committee Ranking Member Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ), Health Subcommittee Ranking Member Gene Green (D-TX) and Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee Ranking Member Diana DeGette (D-CO).

Dated June 30, the letter referred to the CMS Nov. 15 inspection of Theranos’ Newark, Calif., Laboratory and the subsequent letters from CMS on Jan. 25, 2016 and March 18, 2016 detailing failures to comply with Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) requirements. The January letter had documented results of the inspection and listed the condition-level and standard-level CLIA violations and the March 18 letter notified Theranos that CMS was considering imposing sanctions. The Committee members also expressed concern about news media reports, in the Wall Street Journal in particular, that raised questions about test results involving Warfarin. Additionally, they cited an independent assessment by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai which questioned accuracy of Theranos testing, noting that study’s inclusion of an example regarding cholesterol testing.

Finally, the letter cites inconsistencies in the company’s own claims regarding its testing. Theranos’ had claimed that the tens of thousands of test results voided earlier this year represented “less than one percent of all blood test results.” The letter questions whether that claim is consistent with statements about volume of patients tested using proprietary technology and whether the company has really identified all potentially affected patients. The leaders requested a briefing addressing the company’s efforts to comply with not only the CMS inspection letters but also the FDA 483 inspection reports issued in August and September 2015. Specifically, the letter requests the briefing address changes to policies and procedures the company has made, efforts to investigate the “root cause” of compliance issues, how it identified affected patients, and how the company is helping affected providers and patients.

CMS Gives Notice of Impending CLIA Sanctions
CMS issued a letter to Theranos July 7 explaining why multiple submissions made by Theranos in response to CMS’ January and March letters still do “not constitute a credible allegation of compliance and acceptable evidence of correction” of the deficiencies found in the 2015 inspection.

For example, echoing the concerns of the Committee leaders detailed above, CMS found fault with the evidence provided regarding corrective actions taken for patients whose test results were “found to have been affected by the deficient practice.” Flash drives purported to demonstrate corrective action were difficult to search said CMS and it wasn’t clear that every identified specimen was addressed in the flash drives. As to quality assessments, CMS said the lab failed to demonstrate what changes were made to ensure there would be no recurrence of the deficiencies. In discussion of proficiency testing, CMS again indicates a concern expressed by the committee leaders about the impact on patients. CMS questioned how the lab arrived at its conclusion that no patients have suffered harm.

Therefore, CMS is proposing revocation of the lab’s CLIA certificate, effective Sept. 5, 2016. Loss of CLIA certification brings with it a prohibition against Holmes owning, operating or directing a lab for two years. Other sanctions include:

  • Effective July 15, 2016, limitation of the lab’s CLIA certificate for hematology services (this takes effect even if appeal is filed)
  • Effective July 12, 2016, an alternative sanction of $10,000 daily penalty until deficiencies resolved (if appeal is filed, the penalty won’t be collected until after the appeal is decided)
  • By July 12, 2016, Theranos was required to provide a list of names and addresses of all physicians and clients who used the lab’s services since January 2014 (due date applied regardless of any appeal)
  • Suspension of Medicare/Medicaid payment eligibility for hematology services effective July 15, 2016
  • Cancellation of approval for Medicare/Medicaid pament for all laboratory services effective Sept. 5, 2016 (this takes effect regardless of any appeal filed)

Theranos Response
“We accept full responsibility for the issues at our laboratory in Newark, California, and have already worked to undertake comprehensive remedial actions,” Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes said in a statement released July 7. “While we are disappointed by CMS’ decision, we take these matters very seriously and are committed to fully resolving all outstanding issues with CMS and to demonstrating our dedication to the highest standards of quality and compliance.”

Theranos got out in front of the news, not only announcing CMS’ threatened sanctions in its own statement, but also attaching a copy of the entire CMS July 7 letter, and providing a Q/A addressing several questions concerning the sanctions and their impact on operations. The company said July 8 it is “considering all its options.” The company’s statement didn’t indicate whether it would be filing an appeal but vowed to continue on with its mission, promising to work with CMS “non-stop to resolve the issues identified.” It addressed the issue of patient safety, stating “Patient safety and quality are our top priorities. As of now, we have not been made aware—by CMS, physicians or patients—of any harm to patient health resulting from our tests.”

Theranos’ statement also highlighted that the company does more than just lab testing, including research and development of “many technologies that are not dependent on running a clinical laboratory.” Promising to continuing building on its mission of accessible and affordable testing, the company explained: “Improving access through innovative technologies is a universal need, with growth opportunities in global and domestic vertical markets.”

Takeaway: Theranos continues to face questions about its technology and compliance with CLIA and FDA requirements as threat of sanctions looms closer.

Subscribe to view Essential

Start a Free Trial for immediate access to this article