Home 5 Laboratory Industry Report 5 Capital-lir 5 Inside the Lab Industry: Laboratory M&A Heating Up Again—On a Smaller Scale

Inside the Lab Industry: Laboratory M&A Heating Up Again—On a Smaller Scale

by | Feb 23, 2015

Laboratory transactions have simmered down over the past couple of years, due to a dearth of still-available acquisition targets and reimbursement cuts that have hit the pathology sector—and the value of its individual practices—particularly hard. The biggest blow was the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ 52 percent cut in the technical component of Current […]

Laboratory transactions have simmered down over the past couple of years, due to a dearth of still-available acquisition targets and reimbursement cuts that have hit the pathology sector—and the value of its individual practices—particularly hard. The biggest blow was the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ 52 percent cut in the technical component of Current Procedural Terminology code 88305 that was implemented last year, which led to overall reimbursement for 88305 dropping by a third. This caused many pathology practices to suffer double-digit percentage drops in their revenues. That dramatically dropped overall practice valuations, taking many pending deals off the table and prompting other pathologists who were pondering selling their practices to change their mind. But evidence is now emerging that mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are perking back up again, particularly in the realm of pathology. However, they are being driven by deals on a significantly smaller scale than in the past, and possibly at lower valuations. That’s the assessment of Jeff Ellis, the managing director of Crosstree Capital Partners, a Florida-based investment banking firm that provides mergers and acquisitions advisory services to diagnostic laboratories. Ellis’s firm has estimated that 16 mergers and acquisitions in the laboratory realm took place during the first half of 2014, compared to just 10 in the first half of last year, an increase of 50 percent. That includes two deals that occurred in Canada, meaning 14 overall took place in the United States. There were also two deals reported in the first part of July, putting the year-to-date total at 16 in the United States and 18 overall. If you add the acquisition of employee wellness firm Summit Health by Quest Diagnostics last March (which is not on Crosstree’s list) the total in the United States rises to 15. By comparison, another transaction list kept by the Pennsylvania-based Haverford Healthcare Advisors toted only eight laboratory deals that took place in the United States during the first half of 2013. Moreover, six of those transactions involved a lab either focused on the practice of pathology or that offers pathology services. The first two deals that were recorded in the second half of 2014 also involved anatomic pathology laboratories. “Last year, we tracked one or two. The reimbursement cuts had hamstrung the market, but we are now seeing signs of stabilization,” Ellis said. Haverford’s list confirms that—there was only one pathology deal during the first half of the year. That was Ascend Clinical’s acquisition of Path Central.
Clinical and Pathology Laboratory Transactions, First Half of 2014
NumberDate Acquirer TargetSegmentTarget State Value of DealMultiple of Revenue Multiple of EBITDA
1JanuaryLabCorpCovance Genomics LaboratorySpecializedNJNANANA
2JanuaryHealth Enterprises Medical LaboratorySkiff Medical CenterOutreachIANANANA
3*JanuaryGamma-DynacareLab Bio-MedicClinicalCanadaNANANA
4*JanuaryQuantum GenetixGenServe LaboratoriesSpecializedCanadaNANANA
5FebruaryLabCorpLaboratory Partners Inc./TalonAnatomic/ ClinicalOH$10.5 millionNANA
6JanuaryMyriad GeneticsCrescendo BioscienceSpecializedCA$270 million9.3NA
7MarchQuest DiagnosticsSolstas Lab Partners GroupAnatomic/ ClinicalNC$570 million1.6NA
8MarchABRY PartnersAegis Sciences Corp.ToxicologyTNNANANA
9MarchQuest DiagnosticsSummit HealthSpecializedMINANANA
10AprilQuest DiagnosticsSteward Healthcare SystemOutreachMANANANA
11MayCellnetixHighline Pathology AssociatesAnatomicWANANANA
12MayIncyte DiagnosticsMedical Center LaboratoryAnatomicWANANANA
13MayAmerican Health AssociatesMedlab Nursing Home LabsClinicalOH$5.5 millionNANA
14MayBelHealth Investment PartnersPrecision ToxicologyToxicologyCANANANA
15JuneAurora DiagnosticsHallmark PathologyAnatomicMANANANA
16JuneAurora DiagnosticsMid-Atlantic Pathology ServicesAnatomicVANANANA
17**JuneCancer GeneticsGentris Corp.SpecializedNC$6.25 millionNANA
18**JulyIncyte DiagnosticsAccupath Laboratory ServicesAnatomicWANANANA
19JulyNeo- GenomicsPathLogicAnatomicCA$6 million0.6NA
Source: Crosstree Capital Partners *Transaction is limited to Canada only. **Occurred in second half of 2014
  Aside from the stabilization of the pathology market, Ellis noted that some regional players are making their own moves, figuring that acquiring a smaller nearby practice can help them add scale easier than growing business organically. One example of that is Seattle-based InCyte Diagnostics. It has acquired two local practices so far this year: Medical Center Laboratory and AccuPath Laboratory Services. Ellis also cited Aurora Diagnostics, which acquired Hallmark Pathology and Mid-Atlantic Pathology Services, both regional labs in Massachusetts and Virginia. Aurora was previously fairly active in M&A but had been on the sidelines for about the past 18 months. “Our sense is that the smaller anatomic pathology groups are in a defensive mode given all the cuts, and the likelihood of further reimbursement cuts in the future,” Ellis said. “They have concerns about their sustainability and profitability at their size, and they are looking for ways to combine or continue their operations.” They are also apparently resigned to smaller asking prices than in the past. “The company may have done 10 million in revenue [before the 88305 cuts] and had $5 million in EBITDA [earnings before taxes, depreciation and amortization],” Ellis said. “Now, they’re doing $7 million in revenue with $2 million in EBITDA with the same volume” and are therefore cutting the potential sales prices for their practices. While more deals have taken place in 2014, there has also been slightly more disclosure of financial terms. Five purchase prices have been disclosed to date, for a total of $866.25 million. That does not include the $6 million price NeoGenomics paid to acquire California-based Path Logic, a July transaction that applies to the second half of this year. The biggest deal according to Crosstree’s list was New Jersey-based Quest Diagnostics’ acquisition of Solstas Lab Partners from a private equity fund for $570 million. At the time the deal was announced, Quest Chief Executive Officer Steve Rusckowski described the deal as in support of the company’s strategy, which includes “restoring growth and driving disciplined capital deployment through strategically aligned, accretive acquisitions.” Quest did not disclose the price it paid to acquire Summit Health. Another substantial deal in the first half of the year was Utah-based Myriad Genetics’ acquisition of Crescendo Bioscience for $270 million. Those were the only deals recorded so far this year with a valuation of more than $100 million. Takeaway: Since the reimbursement for pathology practice has stabilized, the market for practices has as well, helping drive overall laboratory M&A.

This content is exclusive to Laboratory Industry Report subscribers

Start a Free Trial for immediate access to this article and our entire archive of over 20 years of LIR reports.

This content is exclusive to Laboratory Industry Report subscribers

Start a Free Trial for immediate access to this article and our entire archive of over 20 years of LIR reports.