Home 5 Articles 5 University of Miami Settles Lab Testing False Claim Charges for $22 Million

University of Miami Settles Lab Testing False Claim Charges for $22 Million

by | Jun 28, 2021 | Articles, Enforcement-nir, Essential, National Lab Reporter

The University of Miami’s sports teams proudly refer to their school as “The U.” But to the whistleblowers who brought the original lawsuit against the University at the center of this settlement, “The U” stood for “unnecessary,” as in medically unnecessary lab tests billed to Medicare by the University’s lab and off campus hospital-based facilities. Rather than risk a trial, the University has agreed to fork over $22 million to settles a trio of whistleblower lawsuits filed in 2013 and 2014, alleging that the University and its affiliates: Converted multiple physician offices to Off-Campus Hospital Facilities so it could bill Medicare for higher rates and without providing beneficiaries the required notice; Used its electronic ordering system to automatically prompt physicians to order multiple medically unnecessary tests for kidney transplant patients Submitted inflated claims for reimbursement for pre-transplant lab testing done by an affiliate that the affiliate should have billed for directly and then using the Medicare payments to pay the affiliate kickbacks for referring surgical patients. Takeaway  The first thing to take away from this settlement and situation is recognition of the importance of ensuring compliance with the Off-Campus billing of Medicare patients notice requirements. Such requirements count as conditions […]

The University of Miami’s sports teams proudly refer to their school as “The U.” But to the whistleblowers who brought the original lawsuit against the University at the center of this settlement, “The U” stood for “unnecessary,” as in medically unnecessary lab tests billed to Medicare by the University’s lab and off campus hospital-based facilities. Rather than risk a trial, the University has agreed to fork over $22 million to settles a trio of whistleblower lawsuits filed in 2013 and 2014, alleging that the University and its affiliates:
  • Converted multiple physician offices to Off-Campus Hospital Facilities so it could bill Medicare for higher rates and without providing beneficiaries the required notice;
  • Used its electronic ordering system to automatically prompt physicians to order multiple medically unnecessary tests for kidney transplant patients
  • Submitted inflated claims for reimbursement for pre-transplant lab testing done by an affiliate that the affiliate should have billed for directly and then using the Medicare payments to pay the affiliate kickbacks for referring surgical patients.
Takeaway  The first thing to take away from this settlement and situation is recognition of the importance of ensuring compliance with the Off-Campus billing of Medicare patients notice requirements. Such requirements count as conditions of payment and not complying with them can turn the claim into a false claim. The other moral of the story is that “standing” orders remain highly risky and are allowed only when strictly tailored to each patient’s individual circumstances and needs.   

Subscribe to view Essential

Start a Free Trial for immediate access to this article