Home 5 Lab Industry Advisor 5 Lab Compliance Advisor 5 Compliance Perspectives-lca 5 Compliance Perspectives: Feds Using Medicare Laws to Prosecute Non-Medicare Arrangements

Compliance Perspectives: Feds Using Medicare Laws to Prosecute Non-Medicare Arrangements

by | Jul 28, 2019 | Compliance Perspectives-lca, Essential, Lab Compliance Advisor

From - Lab Compliance Advisor Myth: Risk of federal prosecution for health fraud and abuse applies only when you deal with… . . . read more

Myth: Risk of federal prosecution for health fraud and abuse applies only when you deal with Medicare, TRICARE or other federal health programs.

Truth: While that used to be true, the times they are a-changin’. In recent years, DOJ enforcers have broadened their targeting to include not just state Medicaid but also private commercial healthcare activity. And they’re finding new laws and new theories to do it. Result: Most if not all of your lab’s business relationships and ventures are becoming subject to federal scrutiny.

The Traditional Boundaries

Historically, federal health care enforcement concentrated on federal health programs and states focused on state programs. Of course, there’s more to compliance than healthcare fraud and abuse. Accordingly, in conducting their business, labs are also exposed to risks of liability under other federal and state laws, such as antitrust, OSHA, consumer fraud, medical malpractice, etc.

But while the existence of prosecution risk hasn’t changed, the nature of it has. Today, federal health enforcers are willing and able to deploy their vast array of resources to pursue wrongdoing in realms of activity it traditionally left to the states and other federal regulatory agencies. In effect, when you violate a state law or federal commercial law, you may also be committing a violation under federal health fraud laws.

EKRA & the Opioid Crackdown

One of the things driving this trend is the enactment of new legislation making extending federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) and Stark Law liability beyond Medicare to Medicaid and non-government commercial healthcare activity. Exhibit A: In October 2018, a series of new federal laws designed to crack down on illegal opioid distribution and use took effect. One of those laws, the so called Eliminating Kickbacks in Recovery Act of 2018 (EKRA), creates criminal penalties for “patient brokering,” an arrangement in which a third party enrolls an addicted patient into a private health insurance plan and then arranges for that patient to enter a treatment facility or sober home in exchange for a kickback payment.

Significance: Under previous law, a brokering arrangement could be prosecuted as an AKS or Stark violation only if it involved a patient in Medicare, Medicaid or other government health program; it can’t be used to prosecute brokering arrangements involving patients with commercial or private-pay insurance. But unlike AKS and Stark, EKRA is an “all-payor” statute that applies not just to government health programs but also lab services paid for by commercial insurers.

What EKRA Says

EKRA makes it a federal crime, carrying a fine of up to $200,000 and/or imprisonment for up to 10 years, to knowingly and willfully:

  • Solicit or receive any remuneration for referring a patient to a recovery home, clinical treatment facility or lab; or
  • Pay or offer any remuneration either to induce such a referral or in exchange for an individual using the services of a recovery home, clinical treatment facility or lab.

Federal Prosecution for Commercial Health Fraud

Parallel to EKRA is the increase in DOJ prosecutions against health providers for fraud outside the context of federally funded health programs. This trend has been most apparent in Texas where there have been several recent cases of federal prosecution for commercial fraud committed by providers.

The Forest Park Case

The most significant of these cases involves the now-defunct Forest Park Medical Center operating as an out-of-network physician-owned surgical hospital in the Dallas area. Federal prosecutors alleged that Forest Park paid over $40 million in kickbacks disguised as consulting fees for marketing services to entities owned or controlled by physicians in exchange for private patient referrals in violation of the AKS. The more surgeries doctors referred, the more they earned.

If it had been just about the AKS, this would have been pretty routine prosecution. But what made the case novel is that the DOJ also charged the defendants with violating a much lesser known law called the Travel Act which makes it a federal offense to carry on interstate commerce for the purposes of carrying on unlawful activity under another statute—in this case, the Texas commercial bribery statute (Texas Penal Code §32.43). Specifically, the DOJ alleged that individuals associated with Forest Park bribed physicians with cash, gifts, discounted leases and other remuneration to direct patients with commercial insurance to its own facilities and steer patients with lower-reimbursing federal programs like Medicare and Medicaid to others. It also allegedly engaged in routine waivers of copayments and deductibles.

Ten defendants pled guilty. On April 10, 2019, the federal jury rendered its verdict on the nine defendants who risked a trial: seven were convicted, one was acquitted and the other got at least a temporary reprieve due to a deadlocked jury.

Takeaway: You don’t need us to warn you not to commit commercial fraud. But what we can tell you that you may not already know is that you’re not safe from federal prosecution just because your arrangement doesn’t involve Medicare, Medicaid or another federal program. The DOJ is getting aggressive in rooting out fraud and waste in the commercial healthcare market, and finding new laws and novel theories to do so. Result: This is probably a good time to vet your private payor arrangements to ensure they comply with FCA, AKS, Stark and other federal fraud and abuse laws.

Subscribe to view Essential

Start a Free Trial for immediate access to this article